United States v. City of Leavenworth, Kan.
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
O’CONNOR, District Judge.
The parties herein having agreed to a temporary restraining order dated September 7, 1977, this matter is now before the court for determination of the plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction. The question to be resolved is whether the Department of the Army and the Bureau of Prisons have sovereign immunity by virtue of their status as agencies of the United States from exactions sought to be collected by the defendant Kansas Power & Light Company, a public utility that provides electricity to the Ft. Leavenworth Army installation and the…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- James v. Dravo Contracting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- United States v. County of AlleghenySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Graves v. New York Ex Rel. O'KeefeSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Weston and Others v. the City Council of CharlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Jacks v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Crow Tribe of Indians v. State of Montana, and Ramon Dore, Director, Montana Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1979
- United States v. State of Delaware Robert W. Chastant, Director of the Division of Revenue, State of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.