Legal Opinion
Cargill, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided February 5, 1982No. Civ. 4-81-625PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DIANA E. MURPHY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Cargill, Incorporated (Cargill) brings this action against defendants Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (Hartford) and Federal Insurance Company (Federal), seeking recovery under two separate policies of insurance. Cargill alleges it is entitled to recovery under both policies on the basis of losses incurred by Tradax Financial & Leasing, Ltd. (TFL), an English affiliate of Cargill, as a result of certain acts of Ronald Graham and Arthur Thompson, employees of TFL. Cargill seeks judgment of $5,000,000 under each of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Vette Company and Kansas City Boneless Beef, Inc. v. The Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- Landro v. Glendenning Motorways, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Laker Airways Ltd. v. Sabena, Belgian World AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Hu v. CrockettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Katch, LLC v. SweetserDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
- Garpeg, Ltd. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- American Home Assurance Co. v. Insurance Corp. of Ireland Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.