Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
This tax-refund litigation requires us to explore the uncertain terrain surrounding the tax treatment of settlement payments made under the False Claims Act (FCA), 31 U.SU. §§ 3729-3733. We hold, as a matter of first impression in this circuit, that in determining the tax treatment of an FCA civil settlement, a court may consider factors beyond the mere presence or absence of a tax characterization agreement between the government and the settling party. While this holding may be at odds with the decision in Talley Industries Inc. v. Commissioner, 116 F.3d 382 (9th…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Indopco, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Frank Lyon Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lyeth v. HoeySupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Palmer v. BenderSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States v. BornsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Matalon v. HynnesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- Rodriguez-Valentin v. Doctors' Center Hosp. (Manati), Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022
- Nacchio v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Eustace v. Springfield Public SchoolsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2023