Legal Opinion

Kutsenkow v. Kutsenkow

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 1, 1964No. Appeal, 34PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice O’Brien,

The plaintiff-appellants filed a complaint in equity seeking, among other things, the reformation of a deed. .It was alleged in the complaint that the defendants agreed to convey property fronting 329 feet on a certain highway and extending back 130 feet. The appellants further alleged tha,t a deed was prepared, executed, acknowledged and delivered which conveyed property fronting 129 feet on the above highway and extending back 130 feet. This action was brought to Compel a reformation of the deed to include the 200 feet of frontage not included in the deed.

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Haskell v. HeathcoteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Bugen v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Radnor Building & Loan Ass'n v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Krieger v. Rizzo and RizzoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Giant Food Stores, LLC v. THF Silver Spring Development, LPSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Evans v. MarksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Regions Mortgage, Inc. v. MuthlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. McNAUGHTON PROPERTIES, LP v. BarrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Bollinger v. Central Pennsylvania Quarry Stripping & Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API