Legal Opinion

Freudenheim v. Raduziner

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided December 15, 1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by defendant from judgment directed for plaintiff on trial by court without jury. '

1Opinion of the CourtYak Wyok, J.

The alleged cause is goods sold and delivered to defendant of the agreed price of $728.97, and the answer specifically admits this, and alleges that ■ defendant paid plaintiff on account thereof $560, by her certain promissory notes. The defendant, with her answer, served on October 20, 1894, a written offer to allow judgment for $170, interest, costs and disbursements, and the plaintiff thereafter, on October twenty-fourth, served a written acceptance of this offer, and upon November second he entered judgment upon the offer and his acceptance thereof for $192.28. However, before entry of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Freudenheim v. RaduzinerCity of New York Municipal Court · 1895
  2. Freudenheim v. RaduzinerCity of New York Municipal Court · 1895
  3. Walsh v. Empire Brick & Supply Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API