People v. Perkins

The people move to affirm (GCR 1963, 817.5[3]) defendant’s conviction, on plea of guilty, of assault with intent to rob being armed, contrary to MCLA § 750.89 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.284).

On appeal, defendant contends that the court erred in accepting his plea because, while narrating his part in the offense, he said:

“I drove around the corner. We went back to Good Housekeeping Store and we went in to, to rob it. And then I kind of changed my mind and 1 left. Well, I didn’t leave the scene of the crime, I went back around the corner to my car.

“And by the time I got back around to the car, the…