Legal Opinion
In re Hoffman
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho
Decided September 17, 2015No. Bankruptcy Case No. 15-40391-JDPPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
Jim D. Pappas, United States Bankruptcy Judge
Introduction
Chapter 131 trustee Kathleen A. MeCal-lister (“Trustee”) objects to confirmation of the plan proposed by debtor Tracey Hoffman (“Debtor”). To resolve the objection, the Court must decide whether two claims filed in the case, based upon debts for which the debtor is not personally liable, may be treated as allowed unsecured claims, and may share in distributions under Debtor’s proposed chapter 13 plan. After conducting a confirmation hearing, and having considered the parties’ briefs and arguments, as well as…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Dewsnup v. TimmSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Johnson v. Home State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- First Federal Bank of California v. Weinstein (In Re Weinstein)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re WoodruffUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
- In re DavisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2016