Legal Opinion

Starr v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 3, 2004No. A04A1454PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Chief Judge.

Mark Robert Starr was convicted by a jury of one count of child molestation. His motion for new trial, as amended, was denied, and he appeals. Starr argues that the victim’s videotaped statement and his own two audiotaped statements were improperly admitted, and he enumerates as error a portion of the trial court’s jury charge. Because we conclude that in its jury instructions the trial court improperly expressed an opinion on the evidence in violation of OCGA § 17-8-57, we reverse and remand this case for a new trial.

Construed in favor of the verdict, evidence was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Sedlak v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  3. King v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  4. Askea v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  5. Alexander v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hanson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
  2. Hatley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
  3. Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  4. Howell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  5. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API