Legal Opinion

In re Rodwin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 23, 2000PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent, Richard Rodwin, was admitted to the practice of law in New York by the First Judicial Department on December *1685, 1955, and at all times relevant herein has maintained an office for the practice of law within this Department.

In an indictment filed on February 17, 1999, respondent was charged in Supreme Court, New York County, with grand larceny in the first degree and four counts of grand larceny in the second degree, in violation of Penal Law §§ 155.42 and 155.40 (1), respectively, in connection with his alleged theft of client funds in excess of $1,150,000. On…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re DavidAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Biondi v. Beekman Hill House Apartment Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. In re RodwinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. Matter of OgiharaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. In re ConroyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. In re AdlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. In re AdelmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. In re BloomfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API