State v. KAWA
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGerrard, J.
The question presented in this appeal is whether an actual and serious conflict of interest is presented in a criminal proceeding when the prosecution offers a favorable plea agreement to one codefendant, conditioned on testimony against another codefendant who is represented by the same attorney. Because there is a conflict of interest in this case requiring disqualification of defense counsel, we affirm the disqualification order entered by the district court.
BACKGROUND
The appellants, Thomas J. Kawa and Sean A. Flanagan, were each charged by information with two counts of conspiracy to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Flanagan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Lewis Aaron CookCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Pedro L. AlvarezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Joseph Vincent Agosto, United States of America v. Deil Otto Gustafson, United States of America v. Joan Lorrain NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Heckman v. MarchioNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. CottonNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. CottonNebraska Supreme Court · 2018