Legal Opinion

Bindra v. Michael Bowman & Associates, Inc.

Virginia Circuit Court

Decided September 19, 2001No. Case No. (Law) 191866PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BY JUDGE MARCUS D. WILLIAMS

This cause came to be heard on July 27, 2001, upon Parex, Inc.’s demurrer to Michael Bowman & Associates, Inc.’s Cross-Claim. As discussed infra, the demurrer is sustained.

Background

Plaintiffs are the owners of a home in McLean, Virginia; the house is allegedly clad with a synthetic stucco material, Exterior Insulation and Finish Systems (“EIFS”). Defendant Michael M. Bowman & Associates, Inc. (“Bowman”) is the builder that constructed Plaintiffs’ home. Defendant Parex, Inc., manufactured the EIFS used on Plaintiffs’ home.

Plaintiffs filed their Motion for Judgment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Beard Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. Thompson Plastics, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1997
  2. Smith v. HensleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1961
  3. Winchester Homes, Inc. v. Hoover Universal, Inc.Fairfax County Circuit Court · 1992

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re Chinese Drywall CasesNorfolk County Circuit Court · 2010
  2. Campbell v. Ethex Corp.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2006
  3. Saiyed v. Council on Am.-Islamic Relations Action Network, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  4. Lopez v. Council on American-Islamic Relations Action Network, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
  5. Saiyed v. Council on American-Islamic Relations Action Network, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API