Legal Opinion

President ex rel. Queen's Hospital v. Castle

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1894Published

On Appeal prom First Judge, First Circuit Court, denying a Writ of Mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court, by

Judd, C.J.; The substantial facts of this case are as follows: Thé steamer “Miike Maru” brought to this port from Japan on -the 26th June last some 1200 Japanese engaged with the .Board of Immigration under contracts to labor in these islands. The trustees of the Queen’s Hospital claimed that ■under the statutes in force, the Collector General should ■collect of the steamer the sum of one dollar for each such passenger for the benefit of the hospital. The Collector (General under written instructions from the Minister of .Finance allowed the steamer to be cleared from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kendall v. United States Ex Rel. StokesSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  2. State ex rel. Craig v. DoughertySupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  3. Castle v. KapenaHawaii Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Hawaiian Bell Telephone Co. v. Mutual Telephone Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1885
  5. In re RichardsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1877

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API