Legal Opinion

Fance v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 9, 1929No. 12362Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

— It was charged in the indictment that the appellant did unlawfully possess and have in his possession a still, mash and equipment for the purpose of manufacturing spirituous, vinous and malt liquor and intoxicating liquor capable of producing intoxication. In the same form the offense was described in the charge of the court. There was a general verdict finding the appellant guilty and assessing his punishment in the penitentiary for a period of two years. In writing the judgment the offense was described as “possessing a still, mash, etc.”…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Larned v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1900
  2. Gradington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Meadors v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API