Dove v. Simmons
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
John Calvin Dove, Jr. v. Gary Simmons, et al., No. 63, September Term, 2025 ELECTION LAW – CERTIFICATE OF CANDIDACY – RESIDENCY – DOMICILE – FALSE STATEMENT – CONTINUANCE WHERE MEMBER OF GENERAL ASSEMBLY IS ATTORNEY OF RECORD – Supreme Court of Maryland held that under Md. Code Ann., Cts. & Jud. Proc. (1974, 2020 Repl. Vol.) (“CJ”) § 6- 402(b), court is required to grant motion for continuance of proceeding only when member of General Assembly, who is attorney of record in proceeding, files motion requesting continuance of proceeding before legislative session begins. Supreme Court concluded…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Edward J. DeBartolo Corp. v. Florida Gulf Coast Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Schisler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Koshko v. HainingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Kenneweg v. County Commissioners of Allegany CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
- Professional Staff Nurses Ass'n v. Dimensions Health Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.