Legal Opinion

Oliver v. Schultz

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1994No. 93-SC-813-TGPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STUMBO, Justice.

Patty Oliver appeals a judgment of the Meade Circuit Court upholding the validity of a restrictive covenant forbidding the placement of a mobile home upon her property. After reviewing the record and the law, we reverse.

A brief summary of the facts is in order. On March 14, 1990, Oliver purchased two tracts of land from Rosalie Waters. One tract contained 4.77 acres of land; the other consisted of 4.96 acres. The deed from Waters to Oliver contained no restrictions upon the use of either tract; however, it is undisputed that a restrictive covenant forbidding the placement of a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Paine v. La Quinta Motor Inns, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1987
  2. Hedges v. StuckerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  3. Bishop v. RueffCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1981
  4. Franklin v. MoatsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954
  5. Swinney v. HaynesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Linda Holt v. John GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  2. Wells Fargo Financial Leasing, Inc. v. GriffinDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2013
  3. KL & JL Investments, Inc. v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2015
  4. Dukes v. LinkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2010
  5. Black v. BirnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2005

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API