Critton v. State

The appellant challenges judgments óf conviction and habitual violent felony offender sentences, as well as a restitution order. The appellant has not established *934any reversible error with regard to the judgments of conviction. Certain prosecu-torial comments made during closing argument may have been improper, but the appellant did not object and the comments did not so impair the fairness of the proceeding as to produce any fundamental error. However, the sentences must be vacated due to the court’s failure to make the specific findings required by section 775.-084(l)(b)3 and 4, Florida…