Legal Opinion
Prohosky v. Department of Natural Resources
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided September 21, 1992No. 56A03-9203-CV-83PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge.
Appellants-plaintiffs Robert and Wanda Prohosky appeal the dismissal of their petition for judicial review.
The Prohoskys' issues can be summarized in one issue: whether the trial court erred in dismissing the petition for failure to name and serve the Natural Resources Commission.
The facts relevant to this appeal disclose that on August 17, 1988, the Prohoskys filed a complaint with the Department of Natural Resources (Department) under the Indiana Ground Water Emergency Act. IND.CODE § 183-2-2.5 (1988 Ed.) This complaint alleged a failure of a well on the Prohoskys' property.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Clary v. National Friction Products, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1972
- Teepe v. REVIEW BOARD ETC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1964
- Robert Prohosky v. The Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Prohosky v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1984
3Cited by8 opinions
- Shipshewana Convenience Corp. v. Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Hoosier Environmental Council v. Department of Natural ResourcesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Indiana Office of Environmental Adjudication v. KunzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Lindsey v. De Groot Dairy LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Commissioner, Indiana Department of Environmental Management v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.