Legal Opinion

King v. King

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 28, 1943PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFulbright, J.

This is a suit for divorce instituted in the Circuit Court of Pulaski County. The petition is in conventional form and contains all necessary averments. It alleges indignities which, if true, constitute statutory grounds for divorce and are sufficient under the statute to entitle him to the relief prayed." It alleges that plaintiff! “has resided within the State of Missouri one whole year next before the filing of this petition; that the offense or injury complained of was committed in this State and while both the parties herein resided in this State.” The action was returnable to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Osmak v. American Car & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  2. Werz v. WerzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. Tebbe v. TebbeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. Bowzer v. BowzerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1941
  5. Tate v. TateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  2. Tucker v. TuckerOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  3. State ex rel. Montgomery v. KnustMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. In re Naturalization of RobertsonDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API