Legal Opinion

Estates of Braun v. Cactus Pete's, Inc.

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided January 16, 1985No. 14546PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Chief Judge.

Two issues are raised in this appeal. First, does Idaho law recognize a cause of action against a tavern owner for injuries alleged to have been foreseeably caused by a patron to whom the tavern owner’s employees continued to serve drinks after he became intoxicated? Second, does Idaho or Nevada law apply in a suit brought by the children of Idaho residents killed in an auto accident which occurred in Idaho and allegedly was caused by another Idaho resident who had become intoxicated in a Nevada tavern? The trial court decided Nevada law applied in this case and that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Alegria v. PayonkIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Meade v. FreemanIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Carver v. SchaferMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Kirby v. SonvilleOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Rungee v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bergman v. HenryIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Estates of Braun v. Cactus Pete's, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Bergman v. HenryIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Estates of Braun v. Cactus Pete's, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Estates of Braun v. Cactus Pete's, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API