Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Baker's Estate

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 16, 1956No. 48984Published

1DissentOliver, J.

(dissenting) — I respectfully dissent.

The majority opinion cites many authorities which hold the sale or contract of sale of his interest by one joint tenant (or less than all of them) works a severance of the joint tenancy. No one disputes this rule. Having established it, the majority opinion reasons, incorrectly, that because a contract of sale of his interest by one joint tenant works a severance of the joint tenancy, a contract of sale by all the joint tenants likewise works a severance and changes the character of the unpaid balance into a tenancy in common.

The majority opinion thus…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bramberry's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  2. In Re the Estate of BlumenthalNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. Buford v. DahlkeNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Fish v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Detroit & Security Trust Co. v. KramerMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API