In Re Baker's Estate
Supreme Court of Iowa
1DissentOliver, J.
(dissenting) — I respectfully dissent.
The majority opinion cites many authorities which hold the sale or contract of sale of his interest by one joint tenant (or less than all of them) works a severance of the joint tenancy. No one disputes this rule. Having established it, the majority opinion reasons, incorrectly, that because a contract of sale of his interest by one joint tenant works a severance of the joint tenancy, a contract of sale by all the joint tenants likewise works a severance and changes the character of the unpaid balance into a tenancy in common.
The majority opinion thus…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bramberry's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- In Re the Estate of BlumenthalNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Buford v. DahlkeNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
- Fish v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Detroit & Security Trust Co. v. KramerMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.