Legal Opinion

State v. Condon

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 9, 2003No. Appeal No. C-020262, Trial No. B-0100380(A)Published

1Opinion of the Court

Gorman, Judge.

{¶ 1} The defendant-appellant, Thomas Condon, appeals from his conviction and sentence on eight counts of grossly abusing eight different corpses, violations of R.C. 2927.01(B). The statute prohibits anyone, without authorization of law, “to treat a human corpse in a way that would outrage reasonable community sensibilities.” Acting without official permission or the consent of family members, Condon used the corpses as models for his photographic art, taking pictures of them, some of which he posed with props, as they awaited retrieval in the Hamilton County Morgue. Based…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API