Legal Opinion

Eurton v. Smith

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 24, 1978No. 77-145PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by J.W. Eurton and Margaret B. Eurton from a judgment entered by the trial court ordering them to specifically perform under a lease-sale agreement by executing and delivering to Madge E. Smith a deed conveying real estate. We affirm.

Mrs. Smith filed this action for specific performance in the trial court to have the Eurtons execute and deliver a deed conveying to her the title to a tract of land described in a lease-sale contract. The complaint alleged that Eurton agreed to lease the described real estate to Mrs. Smith for a consideration of $4,000 ($300 paid in cash and the balance…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Humphrey v. HumphreySupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  2. Murray v. WebsterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  3. Commercial Union Fire Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. ParvinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  4. Mooney v. WeaverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  5. Hawkins v. CostonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. B.K.W. Enterprises v. Tractor Equip. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. In Re Central Foundry Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1985
  3. Killen v. AkinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  4. Noel Smith Dev. Co. v. National Filtronics, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  5. Hamner v. Rock Mountain Lake, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API