Legal Opinion

Keefe v. Moskin Stores, Inc.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 20, 1953No. 1314Published

1Opinion of the Court

CAYTON, Chief Judge.

Moskin Stores sued Keefe, a former store manager, for shortages of cash and merchandise. The claim was based on a written contract under which Keefe was to be liable for such shortages unless he furnished proof “that the deficiency in the said merchandise or loss of cash referred to, was caused by the theft, larceny or acts of persons, other than Employee or other than persons hired or employed by or in or about the business of the Employer.” The validity of the contract was not challenged in the trial court nor is it questioned here: After a trial without a jury judgment…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Du Bose v. DrummondDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API