Legal Opinion
Giesler v. Moulet
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 5, 1926No. Nos. 1794, 1795PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Chief Justice.
The invention involved in this interference is a pump designed for use in internal combustion engines, to pump the gasoline or other liquid fuel from the supply tank to the carbureter, with a pressure automatically regulated by the speed of the engine. The pumping member is fastened in a casing located between the tank and the carbureter, and cofineeted with each by a feed pipe; it is a collapsible and expansible construction shaped like an accordion. The engine, when running, operates a cam and yoke, which first contract the pumping member for the suction stroke, and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kling v. HaringDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1926
- Seror v. DickCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1925
3Cited by4 opinions
- Armstrong v. LevyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1928
- Stewart-Warner Corp. v. A C Spark Plug Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1933
- Chemical Foundation, Inc. v. General Aniline Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
- Chemical Foundation, Inc. v. General Aniline Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938