Legal Opinion

O'Meara v. Gottsfield

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1993No. CV-92-0492-PRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CORCORAN, Justice.

We granted this petition for review to decide whether the requirements of due process are satisfied when: the prosecutor reads all relevant statutes to the grand jury at the commencement of its term, provides the grand jurors with a copy of all relevant statutes for reference, and asks the grand jurors if they later want statutes reread or clarified, although he does not reinstruct the grand jury at a time close to the issuance of an indictment. We hold that this procedure satisfies due process. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const. art. 6, § 5(3), A.R.S. §…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. State v. VillafuerteArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. BarnettArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Crimmins v. SUPERIOR CT. IN & FOR MARICOPA CY.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Aranzi Rae Jon Willis v. Hon. bernini/stateArizona Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Dominguez v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API