Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Black Bear Fuel Oil, Ltd. v. Swan Lake Developers LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 14, 2015No. 518848Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

McCarthy, J.P.

(concurring in part and dissenting in part). Plaintiff was entitled to summary judgment against defendants Swan Lake Developers LLC and Yitzchok Kaufman because defendants’ allegations and submissions fail to state defenses or counterclaims that could offset plaintiffs entitlement to payment pursuant to the settlement/subordination agreements. The majority decision recognizes that defendants’ allegations are factually intertwined with the subject contractual agreements, and concludes, apparently on that basis, that plaintiffs motion for summary judgment seeking payment pursuant…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. 511 West 232nd Owners Corp. v. Jennifer Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Carvel Corp. v. NoonanNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Quail Ridge Associates v. Chemical BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Riverside Syndicate, Inc. v. MunroeNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. 10 Ellicott Square Court Corp. v. Violet Realty, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API