Sidorowicz v. Sidorowicz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*738A party seeking modification of an existing custody arrangement must show the existence of such a change in circumstances that modification is required to ensure the continued best interests of the child (see Matter of Sparacio v Fitzgerald, 73 AD3d 790, 790-791 [2010]; Matter of Russell v Russell, 72 AD3d 973, 974 [2010]; Trinagel v Boyar, 70 AD3d 816, 816 [2010]). Those best interests are determined by a review of all of the relevant circumstances (see Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167, 171 [1982]; Matter of Ross v Ross, 96 AD3d 856, 857 [2012]). Here, after a hearing, the Family Court, in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Eschbach v. EschbachNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Trinagel v. BoyarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Sparacio v. FitzgeraldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Russell v. RussellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Moran v. CortezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- In re Angelina L.C. Nassau County Department of Social ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Cortez v. CortezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Matter of Lombardi v. ValentiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Bennett v. SchultzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Ellis v. BurkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.