Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Roberts v. Faust

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 11, 1995No. A95A0111Published

1ConcurrenceBeasley, Chief Judge

I concur in the judgment because I am compelled to do so due to the whole court decision in Sisk v. Patel, 217 Ga. App. 156 (456 SE2d 718) (1995). However, a facsimile is not the equivalent of an affidavit, else why is it necessary to file the original affidavit after a facsimile is filed? In addition, the document initially filed in this case was not a facsimile of the affidavit subsequently filed after the twice-extended time had expired; the signatures differed.1

By deciding that a timely filed facsimile fulfills the requirements of OCGA § 9-11-9.1 (b), the court avoids the applicability of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cheeley v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. St. Joseph's Hospital, Inc. v. NeaseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  3. Commonwealth Investment Co. v. FryeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  4. Sisk v. PatelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  5. Brown v. Middle Georgia Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API