Legal Opinion
KUZINSKI v. Schering Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided August 5, 2011No. Civil 3:07cv233 (JBA)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JANET BOND ARTERTON, District Judge.
On May 8, 2007, Plaintiffs Eugene Kuzinski, Marc Campano, Jerry Harris, and Shawn Jones filed an Amended Complaint against Defendant Schering Corporation (“Schering”) on behalf of themselves and other Schering Pharmaceutical Sales Representatives alleging that Schering misclassified them as exempt from the overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq. Schering previously moved for summary judgment on the ground that Plaintiffs were exempt from the overtime provisions of the FLSA…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Shelley Weinstock v. Columbia UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Pabon v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Reiseck v. Universal Communications of Miami, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Mullins v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fiore v. PPG Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Flores v. The National Football LeagueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- Selene Finance, LP v. County of SacramentoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Trejo v. California Forensic Medical GroupDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2024