Schlosser v. Bethel School District
Court of Appeals of Washington
1DissentWorswick, J.
¶37 (dissenting) — I respectfully dissent. RCW 28A.405.310(8) gives Lynda Schlosser a property interest in her contract’s renewal. Because she had such an interest, procedural due process entitled Schlosser to an informal predeprivation hearing. See Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 545-46, 105 S. Ct. 1487, 84 L. Ed. 2d 494 (1985). Bethel School District did not provide Schlosser a hearing prior to its decision to nonrenew her contract, thus violating her procedural due process rights.
I. Schlosser Had a Property Interest in Contract Renewal
¶38 The majority correctly holds…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.