Legal Opinion
Wilhelmshaven Acquisition Corp. v. Asher
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 15, 1993No. 91 Civ. 3657 (MGC)PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CEDARBAUM, District Judge.
This diversity action arises out of an alleged agreement dated July 13, 1990 (“the July 13 agreement”) between the predecessor in interest of Wilhelmshaven Acquisition Corporation (“WAC”) 1 a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsid iary of Goldman Sachs Group, L.P., and two European entities, Beta Raffineriegesellschaft Wilhelmshaven mbH (“Beta”) and Bulk Oil A.G. (“Bulk”) and two foreign individuals, Jeremy Asher and Mark Woloshyn. WAC claims that in the fall of 1990 defendants Asher and Woloshyn improperly repudiated the July 13 agreement and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Harold Noel Arrowsmith, Jr. v. United Press InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Cutco Industries, Inc. v. Dennis E. NaughtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Hoffritz for Cutlery, Inc. And Edwin Jay, Inc. v. Amajac, Ltd. And Jack E. AyersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- International Customs Associates, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Sacody Technologies, Inc. v. Avant, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Liberatore v. CalvinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Worldwide Futgol Associates, Inc. v. Event Entertainment, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1997
- Levisohn, Lerner, Berger & Langsam v. Medical Taping Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.