Legal Opinion

Junzhi Shao v. City Of Kent

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 12, 2018No. 75505-6Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

4A17:144,4 :4=4. TILED :COURT OF APPEALS DIV I STATE OF WASHINGTON ,2010 FEB 12 AM 10: 50 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON CITY OF KENT, No. 75505-6-1 (Consolidated with Respondent, No. 75511-1-1) DIVISION ONE VINCENT LLOYD FEASTER; and JUNZHI SHAO, UNPUBLISHED Appellants. FILED: February 12, 2018 Cox, J. — Vincent Feaster and Junzhi Shao were each convicted in the municipal court of the City of Kent of patronizing a prostitute. We granted discretionary review of their claims that the court lacked jurisdiction to prosecute them for these crimes. Concluding that such…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Ravenscroft v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. DentWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. ClausingWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 2005

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API