Naughton v. Dinkgrave
Supreme Court of Louisiana
APPEAL from the Fourteenth Judicial District Court, parish of Ouachita. Bay, J.
1Opinion of the CourtWyly, J.
An order of seizure and sale should not be injoined, as in this case, for insufficiency of the evidence upon which it was rendered. The remedy is an appeal. This is undoubtedly so where a judgment is sought to he revised on that ground. No one will contend that insufficiency of proof is a good ground to injoin a judgment. Why should it be in regard to an order of seizure and sale 1 The law has not so provided.
Where a judgment has been rendered by default, the defendant has ten days after service of the notice of judgment to take a suspensive appeal, and twelve months for a devolutive one.…
2Cited by9 opinions
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. AnzelmoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
- State ex rel. Pelletier v. SommervilleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
- Coreil v. VidrineSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
- Jones v. BouanchaudSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
- Buck v. MassieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.