Langstroth v. . J.C. Turner Cypress Lumber Company
New York Court of Appeals
.’ Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the. Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 28, 1914, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report, of a referee in an action to recover damages from defendant caused by its failure to deliver a cargo, of lumber to the firm of Henson & Pearson, plaintiff’s assignor, under a written contract of sale made by defendant’s agent, Hoban.
Read the full summary
.’ Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the. Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 28, 1914, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report, of a referee in an action to recover damages from defendant caused by its failure to deliver a cargo, of lumber to the firm of Henson & Pearson, plaintiff’s assignor, under a written contract of sale made by defendant’s agent, Hoban. Demand for delivery and failure to deliver is admitted in the answer. With this exception the answer is a general denial. The Statute of Frauds is also set up as a…
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Collin, Cárdózo, Pound, Crane and Andrews, JJ. Not sitting: McLaughlin, J.
2Cited by7 opinions
- Irvmor Corp. v. RodewaldNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Lerand Corporation v. MeltzerNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Byrne v. McDonoughNew York Supreme Court · 1921
- Mandell v. MosesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Lagumis v. GerardNew York Supreme Court · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.