Legal Opinion

State v. H. J. Minar Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 21, 1957No. 36,920Published

1Opinion of the Court

249 Minn. 116 (1957)

81 N.W. (2d) 268

STATE

v.

H.J. MINAR COMPANY.

No. 36,920.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

February 21, 1957.

Ryan, Kain & Mikan, for appellant.

Charles A. Sawyer, City Attorney, and Leo P. McHale, Assistant City Attorney, for respondent.

KNUTSON, JUDGE.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the municipal court of Minneapolis.

Defendant was convicted of a violation of § 4 of the "Dealers in Used Motor Vehicles" ordinance (Minneapolis City Charter and Ordinances [Perm. ed.] 33:57-4) which, as far as material to this case, reads:

"Every such dealer in used motor vehicles shall at the time of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rail v. Little Falls Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  2. State v. KettererSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  3. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. Gardner v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  5. State v. H. J. Minar Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API