Legal Opinion

2200 Carnegie, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 20, 2011No. 96646PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Patricia Ann Blackmon, Presiding Judge.

{¶ 1} Appellant, 2200 Carnegie, L.L.C. (“Carnegie”) appeals the trial court’s decision affirming the Cleveland Municipal School District Board of Education’s (“BOE’s”) valuation of the combined taxable values of Parcel Nos. 103-16-029 and 103-16-030. Carnegie assigns the following errors for our review:

I. The trial court abused its discretion by affirming the appellee Board of Education’s valuation of the taxable value of the subject property owned by appellant as the appellee Board was without jurisdiction over appellant to hear and rule on the March…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Knickerbocker Properties, Inc. XLII v. Delaware County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Roberts v. Clinton Cty. Aud., Ca2007-03-012 (2-11-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. 2200 Carnegie, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. 2200 Carnegie, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. 2200 Carnegie, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API