Legal Opinion
Amoson v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided July 3, 1978No. 55756PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Banke, Judge.
The defendant appeals his conviction for armed robbery.
1. Prior to trial the defendant moved to suppress any identification testimony which the victim might offer on the ground that the victim had previously identified him at a preliminary hearing at which he not been represented by counsel. It was not error to deny the motion.
The defendant relies on the recent United States Supreme Court case of Moore v. Illinois, 434 U. S. 2 20 (98 SC 458, 54 LE2d 424) (1977), wherein it was held that testimony regarding a one-on-one identification made at an uncounseled preliminary hearing is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Yancey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Burrell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Williams v. GoodingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Holmes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Horton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982