Legal Opinion

State v. Martineau

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided September 6, 2002No. 2001-681PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C. J.

This is an interlocutory transfer without ruling from the Berlin District Court (Patten, J.), see SUP. Ct. R. 9, asking what class of criminal actions may be instituted and prosecuted by a citizen without authorization from a prosecuting authority. Because we conclude that New Hampshire common law prevents a private complainant from prosecuting a class A misdemeanor, which is the charge at issue in this case, we do not reach the broader constitutional question of whether private prosecutions by an interested party violate a criminal defendant’s due process rights.

“We accept the statement of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Erikson v. Pawnee County Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  2. State v. MooseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. People v. FarnsleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  4. State v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  5. Biemel v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Frese v. FormellaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022
  2. State v. GubitosiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  3. Eichhorn v. KelleyColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. In Re Richland County Magistrate's CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  5. State v. LangillSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API