Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

SHAH

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 2007No. ID 3580PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

24 I&N Dec. 282

(BIA 2007) Interim Decision #3580 In re Anil SHAH, Attorney File D2004-121 Decided as amended September 13, 20071 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) An attorney who knowingly makes a false statement of material fact or law or willfully misleads any person concerning a material and relevant matter relating to a case is subject to discipline. (2) It is in the public interest to discipline an attorney who knowingly and willfully misled the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services by presenting an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Kirthi Venkatraman v. Rei Systems, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
  3. Gadda v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. United States v. Silverio Ramirez and Angelica VitugCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  5. GADDABoard of Immigration Appeals · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jeremias Medrado Pasqual-Andres v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API