Legal Opinion
Buhmeyer v. Case New Holland, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Iowa
Decided August 29, 2006No. 3:04-cv-90095PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW
PRATT, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (Clerk’s No. 85; see also Clerk’s No. 82), filed July 13, 2006. As an alternative to judgment as a matter of law, Defendants seek amendment of the judgment or a new trial. Plaintiff, Timothy Buhmeyer (“Buhmeyer”), resisted the motion on July 20, 2006 (Clerk’s No. 86). Defendants filed a Reply brief on July 26, 2006 (Clerk’s No. 87). The matter is fully submitted. This Court has jurisdiction over this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Melvin White v. B. Jeffery Pence Natalee Schay, United States of America v. B. Jeffery Pence Natalee SchayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Weitz Co., LLC v. Lloyd's of LondonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Adams v. American Family Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2013
- Toby Thornton v. American Interstate Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 2020
- Weitz Company v. Lloyds LondonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009