Holcomb v. Clark
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
JENCKES, Superior Judge.
— Appellees, plaintiffs below, brought this action against the appellant, whom we will hereinafter .call the defendant, to recover possession of lot 5 in block 9 of Clarkston town site in Pima county, Arizona, on the theory that defendant held possession as assignee of the unexpired term of a written lease between plaintiffs, the owners of the land, and one Frank S. Kaigo; that the term had theretofore expired; and that defendant was holding over contrary to the terms of the lease. Plaintiffs, after setting forth the lease, alleged that defendant purchased from Kaigo…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bedford v. . TerhuneNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
- Frank v. . N.Y., L.E. W.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Leadbetter v. PewthererOregon Supreme Court · 1912
- Cross v. UpsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1864
- Day v. GreenebaumNew York Supreme Court · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Independent Gin Co., Inc. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- Clark v. HolcombArizona Supreme Court · 1927
- Albright v. Varicon, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014