Legal Opinion

Holcomb v. Clark

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1925No. Civil No. 2202PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JENCKES, Superior Judge.

— Appellees, plaintiffs below, brought this action against the appellant, whom we will hereinafter .call the defendant, to recover possession of lot 5 in block 9 of Clarkston town site in Pima county, Arizona, on the theory that defendant held possession as assignee of the unexpired term of a written lease between plaintiffs, the owners of the land, and one Frank S. Kaigo; that the term had theretofore expired; and that defendant was holding over contrary to the terms of the lease. Plaintiffs, after setting forth the lease, alleged that defendant purchased from Kaigo…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bedford v. . TerhuneNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  2. Frank v. . N.Y., L.E. W.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Leadbetter v. PewthererOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Cross v. UpsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Day v. GreenebaumNew York Supreme Court · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Independent Gin Co., Inc. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  2. Clark v. HolcombArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Albright v. Varicon, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API