Legal Opinion

Brookpark v. Rodojev

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 2019No. 2019-0056Published

1Opinion of the Court

On review of an order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are ordered to brief the issue stated at paragraph 27 of the court of appeals' opinion journalized December 13, 2018: "[W]hether the results of any speed measuring device, using either radar or laser technology, is admissible without expert testimony establishing, or the taking of judicial notice of, the scientific reliability of the principles underlying the technology."

The conflict cases are State v. Cleavenger , 2018-Ohio-446, 93 N.E.3d 1027, ¶ 34 (7th Dist.), and In re Z.E.N. , 4th Dist.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Z.E.N., Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fourth District, Scioto County2018
  2. State v. Cleavenger, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Seventh District, Belmont County2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API