Jones v. Bechtel
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUG, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff-appellant Albert Jones appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2000e-17 (1982) (“Title VII”) and under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (1982). He also appeals the court’s denial of his motions for appointed counsel and to compel discovery and its failure to consider his motion for class certification. We reverse and remand.
Jones alleged facts which, if proved, could sustain a claim for race and sex discrimination against him as a black male employee. The district court dismissed the complaint…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Runyon v. McCrarySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Gillespie v. CivilettiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Gibson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Johnson v. Riverside Healthcare System, LPCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Parviz Karim-Panahi v. Los Angeles Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Karim-Panahi v. Los Angeles Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Pate v. Chilton County Board of EducationDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2012
- Alva Gutierrez v. Municipal Court of the Southeast Judicial District, County of Los Angeles, Incorrectly Sued as "County of Los Angeles, a Public Entity Porter De Dubovay John W. Bunnett and Russell F. Schooling, in Their Capacity as Officials Having Authority to Issue Personnel Rules for Employees of the County of Los Angeles at the Municipal Court of the Southeast Judicial District," Alva Gutierrez v. Porter De Dubovay John W. Bunnett and Russell F. Schooling, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.