Clark v. Cunning

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Siler

•Affirming.

Appellants, Harry C. Clark and wife, sought to enjoin appellees, Harold Cunning and wife, from interfering in the usage of a roadway running through appellees’ farm. The chancellor having refused to grant the requested restraint, appellants are before us with this appeal.

The sole question on appeal is whether the chancellor committed prejudicial error in denying to appellants a prescriptive easement across the land of appellees.

Appellants bought their farm in 1945 from one Eckart, who had owned it during the preceding 29 years or back to the year…