Legal Opinion

Lanahan v. Lentini

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 16, 1984No. 84-531PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The trial court’s order dismissing the instant case is reversed upon a holding that a trial court is precluded “from exercising its supposed inherent, discretionary power to dismiss a case for failure to prosecute when, as in this case, there is activity of record within one year prior to the dismissal,” American Salvage & Jobbing Co. v. Salomon, 367 So.2d 716, 717 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); see Rivera v. A.M.I.F., Inc., 417 So.2d 304 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), and this rule cannot be circumvented under the guise of dismissing the case on the ground that the plaintiff failed to respond to the court’s order…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. AM. SALVAGE & JOBBING CO., INC. v. SalomonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  2. Rivera v. AMIFDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Glassalum Engineering v. 392208 Ontario Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  2. Feldman v. Renault MotorsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API