Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ragnone v. Portland School District No. 1J

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1980No. TC A7809 14371, CA 14807, SC 26870Published

1DissentTongue, J.

I respectfully dissent because I believe that the technicality which provides the basis for the dismissal of this appeal by the majority, thus delaying, if not avoiding, the decision of a difficult and important question which needs to be decided by this court, represents a triumph of form over substance.

This court allowed plaintiff’s petition for review in this case because of the importance of the question whether not only the Court of Appeals, but the prior decisions by this court, were correct in holding that although a landowner owes a duty of reasonable care to a business guest or…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. ClassenOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. David M. Scott Construction Corp. v. FarrellOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Blystone v. KieselOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Barr v. Linnton Plywood Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API