Legal Opinion

Mazloom v. Mazloom

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 9, 2011No. 26972PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We granted a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the court of appeals in Mazloom v. Mazloom, 382 S.C. 307, 675 S.E.2d 746 (Ct.App.2009). The writ was granted to determine if there is sufficient evidence to support a breach of fiduciary duty by Petitioners and, if so, to determine if this conduct warranted the imposition of punitive damages.

As to the sufficiency of the evidence to support a breach of fiduciary duty, we find that this portion of the question is not preserved for review because it was not raised in the petition for rehearing to the court of appeals. See Rule 242(d)(2),…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Camp v. Springs Mortgage Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  2. Davenport v. WOODSIDE COTTON MILLS CO. INC.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
  3. Jordan Ex Rel. Winner's Circle South, L.L.C. v. HoltSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  4. Mazloom v. MazloomCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
  5. Holly Hill Lumber Co., Inc. v. McCoySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1947

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rory M. Isaac v. Laura KopchynskiSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API