Legal Opinion

State v. Burrow

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided March 21, 1989No. 88-86-IIIPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCOTT, Judge.

The appellees were indicted under two separate indictments for various illegal acts in connection with the sales of “securities,” in violation of T.C.A. §§ 48-2-121(a)(1), 48-2-121(a)(2), 48-2-110(f)(1), and 48-2-104.1 A hearing was held before the trial judge on July 30, 1987, at which no oral testimony was heard, but numerous documents were introduced as collective exhibits during arguments by counsel. The documents were not authenticated in any way and some are not even signed, but consist of drafts of agreements. Following this hearing the trial judge took the matter…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. D. H. Roe and Stratoray Oil, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  3. State v. RandolphTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Farag v. Nat. Databank Sub., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  5. State v. SimmonsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. BilbreyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
  3. State v. LockCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  4. State v. GoodmanTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. NortonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API