Legal Opinion

Askins v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 22, 1864PublishedCited by 2 opinions

CASE 19 — FORFEITED RECOGNISANCE cited Grim. Code, secs. 69, 89, 94; 2 Met., 382; 1 Met., 380; Bac. Abr., title Bail. cited Grim. Code, secs. 88 to 95, 227 ; 3 Met., 384.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Bullitt

Askins entered into a recognizance that Farris should appear at the October term, 1863, of the Jefferson circuit court, and surrender himself into custody, to answer an indictment for felony, and not depart without leave of the court. Farris “ appeared in discharge of the recognizance,” as is stated .in the record, and was put upon trial, during the progress of which he escaped.

Is Askins liable for the escape ? In the case of Commonwealth vs. Coleman it was said, upon the authority of a manuscript opinion (Commonwealth vs. Ray) therein cited, that the fact that the defendant in a felony case…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Huffman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  2. Grimes v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1876

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API