Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Harney v. Hastings

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1860PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPLICATION for a Mandamus. The case is stated in tbe opinion of tbe court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

PAINE, J.

This was an application for a mandamns to compel tbe treasurer to pay two accounts wbicb bad been audited in favor of tbe relator, one for publishing tbe list of forfeited school lands, and tbe other for publishing tbe list of forfeited swamp lands, in tbe county of Oconto, on tbe order of tbe school land commissioners. Tbe return of tbe treasurer sets forth, that previous to tbe making of tbe order under wbicb tbe relator did tbe work, another order bad been made by tbe commissioners, directing that *597the same work should be done by one Ginty, wbo, it is ayer-red,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Perry v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Second Ward Savings Bank v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  3. People v. LawrenceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API